From the EngineIQ Blog

Research, product updates, and deep dives into ML for engineering assessment, PCB design scoring, and the SRHN reasoning engine.

๐Ÿ“

Why PAC-Bayes bounds make engineering scores defensible

Traditional ML confidence is empirical โ€” "our model said 82%". PAC-Bayes provides theoretical guarantees derived from spectral norms of the knowledge graph. Here's the difference in practice.

Read โ†’ 8 min read
โฌก

SRHN v4: 8 research modules for engineering reasoning

Multi-semantic orthogonal views, hyperedge attention, temporal edge decay, and Laplacian spectral reranking โ€” how we built a C11 reasoning engine from first principles.

Read โ†’ 12 min read
โšก

The behavior bonus: why we score how engineers work

An engineer who used the trace width calculator before submitting scores higher on signal integrity. This isn't a reward โ€” it's a genuine, hard-to-fake quality signal.

Read โ†’ 6 min read
๐Ÿ”ฌ

192-dimensional feature fusion: how EngineIQ combines six modalities

PCB geometry + schematic + SPICE simulation + MCAD + interaction trace + SRHN reasoning โ€” why a 192-dim vector beats any single-modality approach to engineering scoring.

Read โ†’ 10 min read
๐Ÿ’ผ

Why technical hiring for hardware engineers is broken

68% of tech interviews test algorithms. Only 4% include any evaluation of actual design work. This is the gap EngineIQ was built to close โ€” for PCB engineers, analog designers, and embedded systems developers.

Read โ†’ 7 min read
๐Ÿง 

GATv2 for circuit design: graph attention networks on KiCad data

We trained a 6-layer Graph Attention Network on KiCad schematics treated as component-net graphs. Here is what the learned 256-dimensional embeddings capture โ€” and what they miss.

Read โ†’ 14 min read

Stay updated

Get new posts in your inbox

One email per post. No marketing. Unsubscribe any time.

Subscribe via email โ†’